Edward Hugo devised and implemented a defense strategy which resulted in rulings which quashed service of the summons and complaints on its client Redland Genstar, Inc., ending five separate cases brought by dozens of plaintiffs in two Bay Area counties.

Brydon Hugo & Parker argued that assertion of jurisdiction would be unconstitutional under the due process clauses of the U.S. and California Constitutions Redland had insufficient contacts with California.

The motion was opposed by plaintiff's counsel who had filed claims in San Francisco and Alameda County Superior Courts against Redland and others, claiming silicosis and other illnesses from exposure to the silica in sandblasting and other materials.

After oral argument by Brydon Hugo & Parker partner James Parker, the Hon. James L. Warren of the San Francisco Superior Court issued an order quashing service of the summons and complaints on Redland in the San Francisco actions.    One week later, following oral argument by Brydon Hugo & Parker senior attorney Paul Bessette, the Hon. Henry Needham, Jr. likewise ruled in Redland's favor in the Alameda cases.